Agreement of the past participle

Accord du participe passé


Accordez selon ce que le mot reprend : je l’ai prévu, entendue chanter, fait réparer, coûté.

(Make the agreement depending on what the word refers back to: je l’ai prévu, entendue chanter, fait réparer, coûté.)

Past participle agreement in relative clauses: the quick decision process

In sentences with que (relative clauses), you often have to decide: does the past participle agree or stay invariable?

  1. Find the past participle (entendu, entendue, fait, coûté, passées, eu…).
  2. Ask: “What is the direct object (COD) of this past participle?” (Who? What?)
  3. If the COD is placed before the past participle → agreement.
    But there are key patterns below where the COD is not the thing before (or the verb is impersonal), so there is no agreement.

1) Verbe + infinitif: “heard / let / made / wanted to…”

This is the most common trap: a past participle followed by an infinitive (e.g. entendu + réparer, fait + remplacer).

Key question Is the noun before the direct object of the past participle (heard/seen), or of the infinitive (repair/replace)?
If it is the COD of the past participle agreement
If it is the COD of the infinitive no agreement (past participle stays invariable)
  • Agreement (the person is “heard” doing something)

    La technicienne que j’ai entendue parler.

    Why? You heard the technician (COD of entendre), and she was speaking.

  • No agreement (the thing is not “heard”; it is “repaired”)

    La chaudière que j’ai entendu réparer.

    Why? What you “heard” is the action (repairing), not the boiler as a direct object of entendre. The boiler is COD of réparer.

Special case: faire + infinitive (always invariable)

With faire + infinitif, the past participle fait is invariable in practice (even if a noun comes before).

  • Les prises que j’ai fait remplacer. faites

  • La voiture qu’il a voulu faire démarrer / qu’il a fait démarrer.

Memory hook: faire works like “have something done” → you don’t “agree” fait with the thing being done.

2) Quantity patterns: coûter, time with passer, and travailler

These look like normal agreement cases, but French often treats them differently depending on meaning.

Verb Typical relative clause Agreement?
coûter (amount/cost) La somme que cela a coûté No (invariable)
coûter (effort/expense felt as “costs”) Les efforts que cela a coûtés Yes (common in careful French)
passer + duration as COD Les heures qu’il a passées Yes
travailler + duration (adverbial) Trois heures qu’il a travaillé No
  • coûter

    La somme que cela a coûté (fixed, standard).

    Les efforts que cela a coûtés (here efforts behaves more like a true COD → agreement is expected in formal contexts).

  • passer vs travailler (time expressions)

    Les heures qu’il a passées → he “spent” the hours (hours = COD) → agreement.

    Trois heures qu’il a travaillé → “worked for three hours” (duration = circumstance, not COD) → no agreement.

3) Impersonal constructions: no agreement

When the clause is built with an impersonal subject (especially il y a), there is no real COD placed before the participle to trigger agreement.

  • Les problèmes qu’il y a eu. eus eues

4) “l’” that refers to a whole idea: no agreement

Another frequent professional-writing pattern: l’ can replace an entire clause/idea, not a noun. In that case, there is no agreement.

  • La réparation s’est mieux passée que je l’avais prévu. prévue

    Meaning: “than I had expected it would go.” Here l’ = the whole situation, not la réparation as a COD.

Self-check: 3 questions to avoid 90% of mistakes

  1. Is there an infinitive right after the past participle? If yes, check who/what is COD of which verb.
  2. Is it faire + infinitive? If yes → fait stays invariable.
  3. Is the clause impersonal (il y a…) or is “l’” a whole idea? If yes → no agreement.

Mini recap (what to pay attention to)

  • Agree when the element before is the COD of the past participle: entendue (I heard her).
  • Do not agree when the element before belongs to the infinitive: entendu réparer (I heard repairing).
  • Do not agree with faire + infinitif: fait remplacer.
  • Learn set patterns: cela a coûté, il y a eu, and je l’avais prévu (l’ = whole idea).
  1. When the verb is preceded by a direct object (COD: who? what?) and the pronoun refers back to an entire clause, the past participle does not agree. La réunion s’est mieux passée que je l’avais prévu. (Il = que la réunion se passerait).
  2. The past participle agrees with the element placed before it if that element is the direct object of the past participle.
Verbe + infinitif (Verb + infinitive)La technicienne que j'ai entendue parler (The technician that I heard speaking)
La chaudière que j'ai entendu réparer (The boiler that I had repaired)
La chaudière que j'ai entendu réparer (The boiler that I had repaired)
Les prises que j'ai fait remplacer (The sockets that I had replaced)
Le robinet qu'il a voulu changer (The tap that he wanted to change)
Quantité  (Quantity)Les efforts que cela a coûtés (The efforts that this cost)
La somme que cela a coûté (The amount that this cost)
Les heures qu'il a passées (The hours he spent)
Trois heures qu'il a travaillé (Three hours that he worked)
 Impersonnel (Impersonal)Les problèmes qu'il y a eu (The problems there have been)

Exceptions!

  1. The past participle of the verb faire followed by an infinitive does not agree: La voiture qu'il a voulu démarrer.

Exercise 1: Multiple choice

Instruction: Choose the correct answer

Fetching your corrections... Please don't close this page yet.

1. Les prises que vous avez ___ remplacer ne sont pas couvertes par la garantie.

The outlets that you had ___ replaced are not covered by the warranty.

2. La technicienne que j’ai ___ expliquer la panne a tout de suite repéré le disjoncteur défectueux.

The technician whom I ___ explaining the breakdown immediately spotted the faulty circuit breaker.

3. La somme que cette intervention a ___ dépasse le devis initial, malgré la garantie.

The amount that this intervention ___ exceeds the initial estimate, despite the warranty.

4. La réparation de la chaudière s’est mieux passée que je l’avais ___.

The boiler repair went better than I had ___.

Exercise 2: Rewrite the phrases

Instruction: Rewrite each sentence as a relative clause with “que” and correctly agree the past participle (agree or not) according to the cases: verb + infinitive, quantities (coûter / passer / travailler) and impersonal constructions. Example: J’ai entendu réparer la chaudière. → La chaudière que j’ai entendu réparer.

Fetching your corrections... Please don't close this page yet.

Show/Hide translation Show/Hide hints
  1. J’ai entendu parler la technicienne au téléphone.
    ⇒ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Example
    La technicienne que j’ai entendue parler au téléphone.
    (The technician that I heard speaking on the phone.)
  2. J’ai entendu réparer la chaudière ce matin.
    ⇒ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Example
    La chaudière que j’ai entendu réparer ce matin.
    (The boiler that I heard being repaired this morning.)
  3. J’ai fait remplacer les prises dans le couloir.
    ⇒ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Example
    Les prises que j’ai fait remplacer dans le couloir.
    (The outlets that I had replaced in the hallway.)
  4. Cette rénovation m’a coûté une somme énorme.
    ⇒ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Example
    La somme que cette rénovation m’a coûtée était énorme.
    (The sum that this renovation cost me was enormous.)

Exercise 3: Multiple Choice

Instruction: Choose the correct sentence.

Fetching your corrections... Please don't close this page yet.

1.
Incorrect: people tend to make “fait” agree with “les prises”, but after “faire” + infinitive the past participle does not agree.
2.
Incorrect: making “coûté” agree with “la somme” is a common mistake; in this construction “coûter” remains invariable.

Written by

This content has been designed and reviewed by the coLanguage pedagogical team: About coLanguage

Profile Picture

Marco De Faria

Master in Foreign Languages

University of Poitiers

University_Logo

France


Last Updated:

Wednesday, 15/07/2026 10:50